Cases 1 - 10 of 13
MOUNTAIN VALLEY PIPELINE, LLC v. EASEMENTS TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE, AND MAINTAIN A NATURAL GAS PIPELINE OVER TRACTS OF LAND IN ROCKINGHAM COUNTY, GUILFORD AND ALAMANCE COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA INCLUDING:
as 1:2021cv00047
Defendant:
1.93 Acres of Land Owned by John Ray Cole and Ravonda Lynn Cole, 9.74 Acres of Land Owned by Jackie Burris Johnson And Ted Mack Johnson And Easement Claimed By Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC, 0.06 Acres of Land Owned by Susano B. Jaimes and others
Plaintiff:
Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717 Natural Gas Act
Hicks v. United States Social Security Administration
as 7:2020cv00235
Defendant:
United States Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Tony Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
United States of America v. The Estate of Cipriano Espinor et al
as 2:2014cv00578
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
The Estate of Cipriano Espinor, Michael C Espinor, Toni Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Hicks v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv01343
Plaintiff:
Tony Hicks
Defendant:
The City of New York , Christop Tehan and John Does 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Hicks v. Michael J. Astrue, Commr SSA
as 10-10467
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY HICKS
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Hicks v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv03156
Plaintiff:
Tony Hicks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Other Statutes
Hicks v. Astrue
as 1:2009mi00265
Plaintiff:
Tony Hicks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Social Security
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00330
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hicks v. United States Military
as 1:2008cv01070
Plaintiff:
Tony Hicks
Defendant:
United States Military
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
