Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Town of Chatham v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2022cv03048
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc, Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Chatham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Town of Chatham v. 3M Company, et al
as 1:2022cv11368
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Inc., Raytheon Technologies Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Chatham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Town of Chatham v. 3M Company, The
as 2:2022cv02220
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, AGC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Town of Chatham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2012cv00033
Defendant:
Chatham, Va Police Department, Attorney Larry Gott, Commonwealth Atty David Grimes and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ling v. Town of Chatham, et al
as 1:2012cv10460
Plaintiff:
Garrett W Ling
Defendant:
Town of Chatham , Chatham Police Department and Mark R Pawlina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Merle Rutledge, Jr. v. Officer Roach
as 10-2310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERLE T. RUTLEDGE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ROACH OF THE CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant:
TOWN OF CHATHAM, VIRGINIA, CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF MARTIN WRIGHT OF THE CHATHAM, VA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2010cv00054
Defendant:
Chatham, Va Police Department, Officer Roach of the Chatham, Va Police Department, Town of Chatham, Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rutledge v. Town of Chatham, Virginia et al
as 4:2010cv00035
Defendant:
Arizona Attorney General Terry Goddard, Chatham, Va Police Department, Chief Marvin Wright of the Chatham, Va Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Merle T. Rutledge, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
