Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Coker v. Toyota Motor Sales U S A Inc
as LAW/1:18-cv-00403
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U S A Inc and Gulf State Toyota Inc
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Coker and Diana Coker
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Coker v. Toyota Motor Sales U S A Inc
as 1:2018cv00403
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U S A Inc and Gulf State Toyota Inc
Plaintiff:
Larry Wayne Coker and Diana Coker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abedi v. Schaumburg Toyota, Inc.
as 1:2018at00151
Plaintiff:
Deeba Abedi
Defendant:
Schaumburg Toyota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abedi v. Schaumburg Toyota, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00312
Plaintiff:
Deeba Abedi
Defendant:
Schaumburg Toyota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baskin v. Jackmax Automotive Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01176
Plaintiff:
Juanakee Baskin
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corporation, Jackmax Automotive Inc and Jackmax Automotive Inc doing business as Serra Toyota Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gill et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2017cv01054
Plaintiff:
Lynda F. Gill and Laurie Rood
Defendant:
Gulf States Toyota, Inc., John Doe Defendants 1-20, Toyota Motor Corporation and others
Gill et al v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Lynda F. Gill and Laurie Rood
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. , Toyota Motor North America, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
O'Dell et al v. Gates Motors Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00916
Plaintiff:
Gerald O'Dell and Dwayne O'Dell
Defendant:
Gates Motors Inc., Gates Toyota, Inc., Gates Chevy World Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
