Cases 11 - 20 of 289
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv23117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv15801
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richey v. Toyota Boshoku Mississippi, LLC
as 1:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Gloria Richey
Defendant:
Toyota Boshoku Mississippi, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cuara R. v. Mark Miller Toyota et al
as 2:2023cv00574
Plaintiff:
Constantino Cuara R.
Defendant:
Mark Miller Toyota, Larry H. Miller Dealerships, Ford Corporate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Thornton v. Baker et al
as 5:2023cv01107
Plaintiff:
Faith Thornton
Defendant:
Derandy Baker, Aramark Services Inc, Bridgeman Hospitality LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
JONES v. GTR ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
DERRELL JONES
Defendant:
GTR ENTERPRISES INC, FRANKLIN R. ROLLINS, JR., CALEB LINDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04386
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
