Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01746
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gray v. Cox
as 2:2023cv00011
Petitioner:
Tracy Gray
Respondent:
Cox and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Gray
as 22-50299
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tracy Gray
USA v. Gray
as 21-51070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Tracy Gray
DRAKE v. CARPE DEUM
as 4:2018cv00041
Defendant:
CARPE DEUM LLC, TRACY GRAY and ERIC RABE
Plaintiff:
KRISTIAN DRAKE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Gray et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02128
Plaintiff:
Tracie Gray , Plaintiffs' Liaison Counsel and Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Defendant's Liaison Counsel and Defendant's Lead Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saul Frazier et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 2:2012cv02037
Plaintiff:
Ulises Almarante, Carrie Bell, Geoffrey Bettany and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corp and Pfizer Inc
Saul Frazier et al v. Pfizer Inc et al
as CAC/2:12-cv-02037
Plaintiff:
Saul Frazier , Ulises Almarante , Carrie Bell and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corp. and Does
Anthony Aberdeen, et al v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., In, et al
as 12-55362
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY Z. ABERDEEN, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRACY GRAY, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and JAY POST, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., INC. and TOYOTA MOTOR NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Gray, Traci v. English, Nicole
as 3:2011cv00696
Petitioner:
Traci Gray
Respondent:
Nicole English
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
