Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lester v. Nemo, et al
as 7:2023cv00042
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cody Lester
Defendant:
Penny Nemo, Jim Shortt, Marx Katherine Patten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lester v. Nemo et al
as 7:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cody Lester
Defendant:
Penny Nemo, Jim Shortt, Katy Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2019cv02352
Defendant:
Chris Moody, Unknown Hudson, State of Arizona and others
Plaintiff:
Edgar Travis Cross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Travis Cross, et al v. AT&T Communications of Califor, et al
as 09-16691
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS CROSS, JOHN ELDER, GABRIEL FILEPPELLI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC., AT&T CORP., AT&T TELEHOLDINGS, INC. and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Travis Cross, et al v. AT&T Communications, Inc., et al
as 09-16688
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TRAVIS CROSS, JOHN ELDER, GABRIEL FILEPPELLI and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T COMMUNICATIONS, INC., AT&T CORP., AT&T TELEHOLDINGS, INC., FKA SBC and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae:
LAW PROFESSORS
Tash Hepting, et al
as 09-16670
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TASH HEPTING, GREGORY HICKS, CAROLYN JEWEL and others
Cross v. Armor et al
as 2:2008cv00072
Plaintiff:
Edgar Travis Cross
Defendant:
John Armor, Richard Hobson, Estrada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Schriro et al
as 4:2007cv00120
Plaintiff:
Edgar Travis Cross
Defendant:
Dora B. Schriro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
