Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Cluse v. Rowden, et al.
as 24-2045
Plaintiff:
DANIEL WILLIAM CLUSE
Defendant:
TRAVIS JAMES ROWDEN, in his individual and official capacities, COUNTY OF COCONINO and JIM DRISCOLL, Sheriff
BRIGHT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13577
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS JAMES BRIGHT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RALEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03662
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS JAMES RALEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JAMES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv14665
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO TRAVIS JAMES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
GAMBEE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv14409
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS JAMES GAMBEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Cress et al v. Ameritech Facility Services, LLC et al
as 6:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
Travis James Cress and Danielle Cress
Defendant:
Ameritech Facility Services, LLC, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Jason Duren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
VERCOE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20237
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS JAMES VERCOE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States v. Myers
as 22-3113
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
TRAVIS JAMES MYERS
Yates v. Amason
as 5:2021cv01194
Plaintiff:
Yates Travis James and Travis James Yates
Defendant:
Detective Chris Amason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mullis v. Lumpkin
as 21-70008
Petitioner / Appellant:
Travis James Mullis
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
