Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Stitely v. Trotta et al
as 1:2016cv00733
Plaintiff:
Stephanie L. Stitely
Defendant:
Michael Trotta, Ryan Luckenbaugh, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalamaras et al v. Mangano et al
as 2:2016cv00459
Defendant:
Corporal Arimani, Armor Correctional Health, Inc., Liutenant John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Bell, Class, Jonathan Tarrell Hooks and others
Rehab Supervisor At N.C.S.D:
Liutenant Caminiti
B.M.U. Seargant:
Seargent Gilooley
BMU Officer:
Officer Griffin
BMU, Seargant:
Sargeant Lavin
Has A Brother Also A CO; Defendant Is The Shorter Of The Two Brothers With A Long Beard:
Officer Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bair v. Trotta
as 1:2015cv01844
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gordon Bair
Defendant:
Michael Trotta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Siennick v. Trotta et al
as 1:2015cv01658
Plaintiff:
Christopher Paul Siennick
Defendant:
Michael Trotta and Ryan Luckenbaugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
TROTTA v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv07128
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ANGELO TROTTA
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Trotta v. Hofstra University
as 2:2014cv04690
Defendant:
Hofstra University
Plaintiff:
Brandon Trotta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv05178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Trotta et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv33988
Plaintiff:
Joan Trotta and Salvatore Trotta
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
