Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Hamilton v. USA
as 5:2024cv00005
Petitioner:
Troy Daniel Hamilton
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10843
Plaintiff:
TROY DANIEL HARPER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WHITE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv02875
Plaintiff:
TROY DANIEL WHITE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thoele v. Bryan et al
as 4:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Troy Daniel Thoele
Defendant:
Judge Travis Bryan, III, Judge John Brick, Jarvis Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Capobianco et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv06125
Plaintiff:
Bridget Capobianco, Alex Leroy, Christian Batista and others
Defendant:
The City of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Marcos Gonzalez Solas, Director of the Mayor's Office of Criminal Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00992
Plaintiff:
Troy Daniel Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniels v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv02284
Defendant:
The City of New York, John Arias, Vanesso Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Troy Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARPER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv07652
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TROY DANIEL HARPER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05558
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Thoele v. Lewis
as 20-20549
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Proctor, Captain, Huntsville Unit, Scott Bailey, Corrections Officer, Huntsville Unit, Candace Pace, Counsel Substitute, Huntsville Unit and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Troy Daniel Thoele
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
