Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Harris v. Archie et al
as 2:2023cv14392
Plaintiff:
David L. Harris and Shonda T. Harris
Defendant:
La Solomon J. Archie, Scott A. Wells, Lt. Robert Petit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17808
Plaintiff:
TROY NORMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mineo v. Saul
as 8:2019cv03179
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Troy Norman Mineo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Mineo v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2019cv03180
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Troy Norman Mineo
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Troy Volk v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-40631
Petitioner - Appellant:
TROY NORMAN VOLK
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Foudy et al v. Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office et al
as 2:2012cv14462
Plaintiff:
Toni Foudy and Shaun Foudy
Defendant:
Saint Lucie County Sheriffs Office, Indian River County Sheriffs Office, Gerald M. Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Troy Powell
as 12-7957
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TROY NAMAN POWELL, a/k/a Troy Norman Powell
US v. Troy Powell
as 11-6152
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
TROY NAMAN POWELL, a/k/a Troy Norman Powell
Volk v. Thaler
as 3:2010cv00253
Petitioner:
Troy Norman Volk
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
EverBank Corporation v. Martin et al
as 1:2009cv01101
Plaintiff:
EverBank Corporation and EverBank Corporation
Defendant:
Troy Norman Martin, Susan Mills Martin, United States Department of the Treasury-Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
