Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Turner v. Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01841
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Turner
Defendant:
Georgia Cyber Academy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Turner v. Astronautics Corporation of America
as 2:2023cv01596
Plaintiff:
Douglas G Turner
Defendant:
Astronautics Corporation of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act 1993
Turner v. Ensurem II LLC
as 8:2023cv02673
Plaintiff:
Raoul Turner
Defendant:
Ensurem LLC and Ensurem II LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Turner v. QC Franchise Group LLC
as 7:2023cv05910
Plaintiff:
Brandice Turner
Defendant:
QC Franchise Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
TURNER v. BLUETRITON BRANDS INC
as 4:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
ALEX TURNER
Defendant:
BLUETRITON BRANDS, INC. and BLUETRITON BRANDS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Seymour v. The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
as 2:2021cv01486
Plaintiff:
RHONDA SEYMOUR
Defendant:
THE WHITING-TURNER CONTRACTING COMP0ANY and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Turner v. Faurecia Exhaust Systems, LLC
as 3:2020cv02575
Plaintiff:
Alex Turner
Defendant:
Faurecia Exhaust Systems LLC and Faurecia Exhaust Systems, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2661
TURNER v. CITY OF PATERSON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
as 2:2019cv20172
Plaintiff:
QUINTON TURNER
Defendant:
CITY OF PATERSON DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
TURNER v. CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
as 5:2018cv00317
Plaintiff:
Marvin A Turner, JR and MARVIN ALLEN TURNER, JR
Defendant:
CSX TRANSPORTATION INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TURNER v. DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 5:2017cv03971
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM TURNER
Defendant:
DART CONTAINER CORPORATION OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
