Cases 21 - 30 of 391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robert Johnson v. Donald Trump, et al
as 23-1953
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FACEBOOK, INC., META and others
Johnson v. Trump, et al
as 23-1783
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
DONALD J. TRUMP, FACEBOOK, INC., META and others
Robert Johnson v. Donald J. Trump, et al
as 23-3122
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert J. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Cresa Global Inc. v. Twitter Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04642
Plaintiff:
Cresa Global Inc.
Defendant:
Twitter Inc. and X Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 3:2023cv05788
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta, Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taiming Zhang v. Twitter, Inc.
as 23-16125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAIMING ZHANG
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC.
Genevieve Morton v. Twitter, Inc., et al
as 23-55732
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GENEVIEVE MORTON, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
TWITTER, INC., a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
SPYIRL.COM, TWITTER INTERNATIONAL COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, TWEETDECK, INC., a Delaware Corporation and others
PRESS APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS IN CASE NO. 23-SC-31, IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY TWITTER, INC.
as 1:2023mc00084
In Re:
PRESS APPLICATION FOR ACCESS TO JUDICIAL RECORDS IN CASE NO. 23-SC-31, IN THE MATTER OF THE SEARCH OF INFORMATION THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY TWITTER, INC.
Interested Party:
PRESS COALITION, X CORP. and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
