Cases 41 - 50 of 118
Smith v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00715
Petitioner:
Tyrone Smith
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. An Easement and Right-of-Way over 0.61 Acre of Land, More or Less, in Clay County, Mississippi et al
as 1:2017cv00192
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Annette Smith Miller, Tyrone Smith, Joyce Smith Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
SMITH v. SMITH
as 2:2017cv00370
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Petitioner:
TYRONE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tryon Smith v. Debbie Asuncion
as 17-56075
Petitioner - Appellant:
TRYON LARRY SMITH, AKA Tyron Smith
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBBIE ASUNCION
Smith v. Stanislaus Co. Sheriff's Dept., et al.
as 1:2017cv00847
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Smith
Defendant:
Stanislaus County Sheriff's Department and California Forensic Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04551
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Smith
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2017cv01999
Plaintiff:
Derrick Tyrone Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Grogan v. Bryson et al
as 6:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Tyler Grogan
Defendant:
Homer Bryson, Doug Williams, Tyrone Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Carlisle (Flowers)
as 17-166
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Diondre Carlisle, AKA Slim Gz, Tyrone Smith, Gudda, Isaiah Washington, AKA Ah-ah and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Rakeem Flowers, AKA Ra ra
In re: Terrence Smith
as 16-6845
Movant:
In re: TERRENCE TYRON SMITH
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
