Cases 1 - 10 of 41
State of Texas v. DHS
as 23-50869
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection and others
Amicus Curiae:
Immigration Reform Law Institute and Center for Renewing America, Incorporated
State of Texas v. USA
as 23-40653
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Texas, State of Alabama, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellant:
United States of America, Alejandro Mayorkas, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy Miller, Acting Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Maria Rocha, Jose Magana-Salgado, Nanci J. Palacios Godinez and others
Intervenor:
State of New Jersey
Indiana, State of et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 1:2023cv00106
Plaintiff:
Indiana, State of, North Dakota, State of, Alaska, State of and others
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Troy A. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Allyn-Feuer v. John Doe
as 2:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Boaz Allyn-Feuer
Defendant:
John Doe U.S. Border Patrol Agents and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
The State of Arizona et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2023mi00015
Plaintiff:
The State of Arizona, The State of Louisiana, The State of Missouri and others
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, The United States Department of Justice, David Neal and others
Petitioner:
Innovation Law Lab
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 22-5325
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, I.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, Tae Johnson, Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Rochelle P. Walensky, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in her official capacity and others
Intervenor:
State of Arizona, State of Louisiana, State of Alabama and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Immigration Reform Law Institute
Ellsworth v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection et al
as 7:2022cv00363
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellsworth
Defendant:
U.S. Customs and Border Protection, U.S. Border Patrol and Teodoro Garza, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Nancy Huisha-Huisha, et al v. Alejandro Mayorkas, et al
as 21-5200
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Nancy Gimena Huisha-Huisha, and her minor child, L.M.C.H., Valeria Macancela Bermejo, and her minor daughter and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, in his official capacity, William A. Ferrara, Executive Assistant Commissioner, CBP Office of Field Operations, in his official capacity, Raul L. Ortiz, Chief of U.S. Border Patrol, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
T. Alexander Aleinikoff, Deborah Anker, James C. Hathaway and others
P.J.E.S. v. Peter Gaynor, et al
as 20-5357
Defendant / Appellant:
Matthew T. Albence, Deputy Director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, in his official capacity, Robert R. Redfield, Dr., Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, in his official capacity, Alex M. Azar, II, Secretary of Health and Human Services, in his official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
P.J.E.S., a minor child, by and through his father and next friend, Mario Escobar Francisco, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated
Amicus Curiae:
Natalia Molina, Gerald L. Neuman, Julian Lim and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
