Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Wilson v. U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
as 1:2024cv11021
Plaintiff:
Raymond Wilson
Defendant:
U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Drevaleva v. McDonough et al
as 5:2024mc80089
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva
Defendant:
Denis Richard McDonough, The United States of America, The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Barthe v. Wetzel et al
as 2:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Earl Barthe, Jr
Defendant:
Sgt. John Wetzel, Veterans Affairs Hospital, ABC Guard Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Buchanan v. USA
as 24-50194
Plaintiff:
Rickey Buchanan, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of the Army, Department of the Air Force and others
Astrop et al v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Joshua Astrop and Roslyn Astop
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Inc.
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 784 Controversies re insurance claims of Veterans Benefit
Watson v. Redmond
as 24-30157
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Watson
Defendant:
Kimberly Redmond, In her individual and official capacity, Fernando Rivera, Director, In his individual and official capacity, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Healthcare System and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00271
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
