Cases 31 - 40 of 97
BANKS v. LEWIS et al
as 2:2019cv01009
Respondent:
ORLANDO HARPER, CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Administrative Office for U.S. Courts and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks v. Lewis et al
as 1:2019cv01388
Petitioner:
Frederick Banks
Respondent:
Central Intelligence Agency, Administrative Office for U.S. Courts, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2019cv03504
Respondent:
USA, ORLANDO HARPER, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT and others
Petitioner:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Frederick Banks v. Postmasters of Pittsburgh, et al
as 19-1337
Defendant / Appellee:
MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, Allegheny County Jail, DEMMIL WALKER, U.S. Marshall, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
BRETT v. SAMSON, et als
as 2:2018cv12908
Defendant:
WOLF AND SAMSON, JOE ANDEE BANU, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRETT v. SAMSON, et als
as 3:2018cv12908
Defendant:
WOLF AND SAMSON, JOE ANDEE BANU, JOHN MORGAN and others
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETTIWAY v. BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2017cv05784
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN PETTIWAY
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. MARSHALLS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roy DePack, Jr. v. Gilroy, et al
as 17-3657
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY J. DEPACK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. MARSHAL GILROY
BRETT v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2017cv05017
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
LAURA SAMPSON, JOE MILLER, SALVATORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Joseph Pilchesky v. Maggie Barone, et al
as 17-2916
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH W. PILCHESKY
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE BARONE, Deputy U.S. Marshal, JOSEPH BROZOWSKI, Deputy U.S. Marshal and ROBERT LENAHAN, Deputy U.S. Marshal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
