Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Willis v. Villegas et al
as 4:2021cv00414
Defendant:
Fransico Villegas, U.T.M.B. ADS Estelle Unit, U.S. Postal Services, Walker County and others
Plaintiff:
Tommy Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv04329
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Wright v. U.S. Postal Service
as 4:2020cv04257
Plaintiff:
Latonya Wright
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Dearing v. U.S. Postal Service et al
as 5:2020cv00131
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Dearing
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Wilkinson County Correctional Facility, The Great State of Mississippi c/o Jim Hood and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendy Carrizal v. Megan Brennan
as 20-50333
Defendant / Appellee:
MEGAN J. BRENNAN, Postmaster General of the U.S. Postal Service
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WENDY CARRIZAL
Johnson v. U.S. Postal Services
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Services
Plaintiff:
Shelly M. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2019cv01754
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, U.S. Postal Service and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr v. Gonzalez et al
as 1:2019cv00506
Defendant:
Probable Cause Judge, Texas Post Master General, New Hope Housing and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond E. Carr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Betancourt et al v. Morales et al
as 1:2019cv00006
Defendant:
U.S. Postal Service, Michael Morales and United States Postal Service
Plaintiff:
Maria Acacia Morin and Abel Betancourt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
