Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Nichols et al v. United States Steel Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Nichols, Jr. and Brenda Lee Nichols
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation, U.S. Steel Tubular Products, LLC and Adam Cliett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv03148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv02730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tolliver v. United States Steel Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv00011
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation, U.S. Steel, United States Steel and others
Plaintiff:
Edward L Tolliver
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Matthew Fodness v. U.S. Steel Corporation
as 21-2650
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Matthew Fodness
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. Steel Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Matthew Winther, et al v. U.S. Steel Corporation
as 20-13593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TRACEY WINTHER and MATTHEW T. WINTHER
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. STEEL CORPORATION
United States of America v. U.S. Indus. et al
as 2:2019mc00113
Defendant:
Smith Scott Co., Inc., United Concrete Pipe Corp., United States Steel Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
