Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Roque et al v. United States of America
as 7:2021cv04013
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Arlyn Roque, S.A. G.R. and S.A.G.R.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Preston v. United States of America
as 2:2021cv00354
Plaintiff:
Andrew James Preston
Defendant:
United States of America, Orange County Judicial Circuit, Wellpath Recovery Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2020cv03342
Plaintiff:
Michael W Smith and Joshua D Warner
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Treasury and Internal Revenue Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warner et al v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv04264
Defendant:
United States Internal Revenue Service, United States of America and United States Department of Treasury
Plaintiff:
Joshua D Warner and Michael W Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupigny v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv10281
Defendant:
Mollie Bracewell, Geoffrey S. Berman, Elinor Terlow and others
Plaintiff:
Hubert Dupigny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mahoney v. Martin
as 1:2020cv00349
Petitioner:
Brian Edward Mahoney
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Martin
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. United States of America
as 4:2019cv00226
Plaintiff:
Charles Jackson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Charles v. The United States Of America
as 7:2018cv00883
Plaintiff:
Michelet Charles
Defendant:
The United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
E.D. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2017cv02691
Plaintiff:
E.D.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hall v. United States of America
as 5:2017cv00277
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Robert Arthur Hall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
