Cases 1 - 10 of 19
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO/CLC v. ArcleorMittal USA et al
as 1:2020cv00387
Defendant:
AM/NS and ArcleorMittal USA
Plaintiff:
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO/CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center v. United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial and Service Workers International Union
as 2:2020cv03799
Respondent:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and United Steel, Paper and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Insustrial and Service Workers International Union
Petitioner:
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO/CLC v. ArcleorMittal USA et al
as 2:2019cv00360
Defendant:
AM/NS and ArcleorMittal USA
Plaintiff:
United Steel Paper & Forestry Rubber Manufacturing Energy Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union AFL-CIO/CLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Essentia Health
as 0:2017cv04753
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Essentia Health
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Tadios Tessema v. Leo Gerard, et al
as 17-15458
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TADIOS TESSEMA
Defendant - Appellee:
LEO GERARD, ROBERT LAVENTURE, MANUEL ARMENTA and others
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC v. Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2017cv00412
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC
Defendant:
Lehigh Southwest Cement Company, Inc. and Lehigh Hanson Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO-CLC v. Hussmann Corporation
as 4:2015cv00278
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Hussmann Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC v. Express Scripts, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00893
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied-Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO/CLC
Defendant:
Express Scripts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC et al v. Sloan Valve Company
as 1:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
United Steel, Paper & Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy, Allied Industrial & Service Workers International Union, AFL-CIO, CLC and Local 7999 United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO-CLC
Defendant:
Sloan Valve Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC. V. UNITED STEEL, PAPER & FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC, ET AL.
as 3:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
FREIGHTCAR AMERICA, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STEEL, PAPER & FORESTRY, RUBBER, MANUFACTURING, ENERGY, ALLIED INDUSTRIAL & SERVICE WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC , DAVID ALT, LARRY AMANN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
