Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Dos Santos v. US Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Denisson Tiago Amaral Dos Santos
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, US Citizenship and Immigration Services, Connie Nolan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421 Immigration: Naturalization Authority
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00237
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2021cv02706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv01917
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00938
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abubakar v. Federal Bereau of Investigation et al
as 0:2019cv01206
Defendant:
Defense Intelligence Agency, Federal Bereau of Investigation and US Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff:
Adam Abubakar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melgar et al v. Sessions et al
as 0:2018cv01956
Defendant:
US Department of Homeland Security, USCIS, Robert Cowan and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelia Concepcion Martinez and Gilma Geanette Melgar
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv06015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
