Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 155
Burns v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 3:2015cv00209
Plaintiff: Georgeann B. Burns
Defendant: US Department of Health and Human Services and Sylvia M. Burwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2005
Insight for Living Ministries v. Burwell et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv00675
Plaintiff: Insight for Living Ministries
Defendant: Sylvia M Burwell , US Department of Health and Human Services , Thomas E Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lawrence Brandt, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-4087
Plaintiff - Appellee: LAWRENCE E. BRANDT, as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, as the Beneficial Owner of the Greensburg series of the Catholic Benefits Trust, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg and others
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
ELR CARE MAINE LLC v. PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00388
Plaintiff: ELR CARE MAINE LLC
Defendant: PROGRESSIVE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS LLC and US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Moates v. US Department of Health and Human Services We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00514
Plaintiff: Mildred Moates
Defendant: US Department of Health and Human Services
Cause Of Action: Declaratory Judgment
Anna Habetler v. Kathleen Sebelius, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-56422
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANNA HABETLER
Defendant - Appellee: KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary, US Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, DONALD BERWICK and others
Lawrence Brandt, et al v. Secretary United States Depart, et al
as 14-3663
Plaintiff - Appellee: LAWRENCE E. BRANDT, as Trustee of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg, a Charitable Trust, ROMAN ARCHDIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, as the Beneficial Owner of the Greensburg series of the Catholic Benefits Trust, CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF GREENSBURG, an affiliate nonprofit corporation of the Roman Catholic Diocese of Greensburg and others
Defendant - Appellant: SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, in her official capacity as Secretary of the US Department of Health and Human Services, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor, SECRETARY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, in his official capacity as Secretary of the U.S. Department of Treasury and others
El v. US Department of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv01325
Plaintiff: Dontia Edwards El
Defendant: US Department of Health and Human Services, Pat Quinn, Peoria County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ATTKISSON v. US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2014cv01348
Plaintiff: SHARYL ATTKISSON
Defendant: US DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Centro Radiologico Rolon, Inc. et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2014cv01611
Defendant: United States of America, Eric Holder, Rosa E. Rodriguez-Velez and others
Plaintiff: Centro Radiologico Rolon, Inc. , Maite Rolon and Cesar Del Valle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?