Cases 81 - 90 of 97
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010at00752
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv01794
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv01419
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01032
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Unknown:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Creditor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Target Stores Inc et al
as 8:2009cv00963
Plaintiff:
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Target Stores Inc and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hospital Auxilio Mutuo
as 3:2009cv01797
Plaintiff:
US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Defendant:
Hospital Auxilio Mutuo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Wilson v. NYC Police Department et al
as 1:2009cv01529
Plaintiff:
Adrella E. Wilson
Defendant:
NYC Police Department, NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board, Jane Doe # 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00258
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
David Hall, Jr. v. US Equal Employment Opportunit
as 08-7718
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LYNN HALL, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
US EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION and VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
