Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 91
Banks v. Joy et al
as 5:2017ct03130
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: S. Joy, C/O McCray, Counselor Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Banks v. Sessions et al
as 5:2017ct03077
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Jeff Sessions, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Mike Pompeo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Banks v. Trump et al
as 5:2017ct03060
Defendant: Trump, Mitch McConnell, Governor of Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff: Banks and Frederick Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tariq Belt v. DEA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7642
Plaintiff - Appellant: TARIQ LIYUEN ADEVEMI BELT
Defendant - Appellee: DEA CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER, DEA BALTIMORE FIELD OFFICE, U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Agency/Buisness and others
Banks v. Ross et al
as 5:2016ct03185
Plaintiff: Frederick Banks
Defendant: Heather Ross, Officer Miller, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MUHAMMAD v. US MARSHALS
as 1:2016cv00444
Plaintiff: SAIYDIN ABDULLAN MUHAMMAD
Defendant: US MARSHALS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Richardson et al v. Horry County Policeman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2016cv00835
Plaintiff: Curtis Richardson
Defendant: Will Duncan, Horry County Policeman, Brian Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv04785
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hephzibah Bates v. US Marshal
as 15-1651
Plaintiff - Appellant: HEPHZIBAH BATES
Defendant - Appellee: US MARSHALS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2015cv01696
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?