Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hill v. Stephens County Sheriff et al
as 5:2023cv00884
Plaintiff:
Juan Demetrius Hill and Juan-D Hill
Defendant:
Stephens County Sheriff, Oklahoma Attorney General, Govenor Kevin Stitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv11830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Surles v. United States et al
as 5:2021cv00918
Plaintiff:
Christopher Surles
Defendant:
United States, US Secretary of State, US Special Counsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00878
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Demos v. US Secretary of State et al
as 3:2013cv00032
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
US Secretary of State, US Attorney General and US Secretary of Defense
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Manjarrez v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2011cv00121
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, Department of Homeland Security, GEO Group and others
Petitioner:
Marcelo Manjarrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bae v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2011cv00102
Petitioner:
Jung Bae
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons, GEO Group, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Powell v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2011cv00074
Respondent:
Bureau Of Prisons, Department of Homeland Security, GEO Group and others
Petitioner:
Richard Wayne Powell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Gomis v. US Secretary of State et al
as 5:2008cv03418
Petitioner:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
US Secretary of State, US DHS Secretary, US Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
