Cases 31 - 40 of 207
Tavares Farrington v. USP Atlanta Warden, et al
as 22-13301
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TAVARES LENARD FARRINGTON
Defendant / Appellee:
USP ATLANTA WARDEN, MORENO, HARDIN and others
Black v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2022cv03786
Plaintiff:
Randy Lamar Black
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Atlanta Unknown Warden, USP Atlanta Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv03028
Plaintiff:
Calvin James
Defendant:
USP Atlanta, Dept. of Trans., USP Atlanta Sanitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Cartman v. Unknown U.S. Marshals, et al
as 22-10178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY VINCENT CARTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN U.S. MARSHALS, JULIE E. CARNES, Former Chief District Court Judge, UNKNOWN CUSTODY OFFICER and others
McCoy v. USP Atlanta (FBOP) et al
as 1:2021cv04698
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant:
USP Atlanta (FBOP) and R. Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Warden of USP Atlanta et al
as 1:2021cv04639
Plaintiff:
Danico Russell
Defendant:
Warden of USP Atlanta, Food Administrator of USP Atlanta, Health Services Administrator and Unknown Health Service Providers of USP Atlanta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCoy v. Harris et al
as 1:2021cv03798
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant:
C. Harris and USP Atlanta (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Harris et al
as 5:2021cv02646
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant:
C. Harris and USP Atlanta (FBOP)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beasley v. USP Atlanta Staff
as 1:2021cv02883
Plaintiff:
Charlton Beasley
Defendant:
USP Atlanta Staff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McKenith v. Odiumdo et al
as 1:2021cv02350
Defendant:
Lt. Odiumdo, Lieutenant O., G. Widmer and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Antione McKenith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
