Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Spells v. Stencil
as 19-1285
Petitioner / Appellant: RONNIE SPELLS
Respondent / Appellee: M.A. STENCIL, USP, Warden
Cortez v. Canaan USP Warden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2019cv00197
Defendant: Canaan USP Warden, Hazelton USP Warden and Gilmer FCI Warden
Plaintiff: Armando Cardon Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Spotts v. Stancil We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-1122
Petitioner / Appellant: KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS
Respondent / Appellee: M.A. STANCIL, USP, Warden
Taquan Gullett v. FCC Coleman - USP Warden
as 18-11242
Petitioner - Appellant: TAQUAN GULLETT
Respondent - Appellee: FCC COLEMAN - USP WARDEN
Evans v. USP Warden Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00276
Petitioner: Rodrick Maurice Evans
Respondent: USP Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rivas v. USP Warden Jones We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00269
Petitioner: Guillermo Gonzales Rivas
Respondent: USP Warden Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Spotts v. USP Warden Lara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00207
Petitioner: Kelvin Andre Spotts
Respondent: USP Warden Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. McGerkal et al
as 3:2017cv00012
Plaintiff: Charles E. Miller, II
Defendant: Officer McGerkal, Officer McCumm, Dr. Brathwait and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clayton v. Lara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00508
Petitioner: Rodriguez Keandre Clayton
Respondent: USP Warden Lara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jason T. Scott v. Warden J.T. Shartle We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-7603
Petitioner - Appellant: JASON T. SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN J. T. SHARTLE, named as FCC Warden, SUSAN MCCLINTOCK, named as USP Warden, Tucson, AZ and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?