Cases 41 - 50 of 172
Junior v. USPS
as 3:2023cv00085
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Rochelle Junior
Defendant:
USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Vang v. Catawba Medical Center et al
as 1:2023cv00018
Plaintiff:
Pakuja Crystal Vang
Defendant:
Catawba Medical Center, Catawba Valley Family Medicine Claremont, Bethany Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv07233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wigginton v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv50440
Plaintiff:
Richard Wigginton
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, USPS Federal Employees, Kaila Osborne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
White v. Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv00471
Plaintiff:
Latawerence W. White
Defendant:
Sheriff's Department, Mobile Police Department, Mawss and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv05902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Thomas v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Deuntae Thomas
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Thomas J Marshall, USPS Consumer and Industry Contact Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brizuela v. USP Hazelton
as 1:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Felix Brizuela
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Mark Donaldson v. Louis DeJoy, et al
as 22-1651
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK P. DONALDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General USPS Great Lakes Area and CHARLOTTE A. BURROWS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
