Cases 11 - 20 of 48
TAYLOR v. USPTO et al
as 1:2022cv01384
Plaintiff:
EZEKIEL I. TAYLOR, SR.
Defendant:
USPTO, UNITED STATES PATENT TRADEMARK OFFICE, DEB HAALAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
AMMONS-HARRIS et al v. THE STATE OF INDIANA AND ALL CORPORATIONS/BUSINESSES THEREIN et al
as 1:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
JEAN T. AMMONS-HARRIS, AMERICAS DAILY-HUSTLER INC, THE USPTO AND FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF INDIANA AND ALL CORPORATIONS/BUSINESSES THEREIN, FOLLOWERS AND FRIENDS, INDIANA CORPORATIONS (CHAMBER OF COMMERCE) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INC. et al v. THE STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00722
Plaintiff:
AMERICAS DAILY HUSTLER INC., THE USPTO, THE INTERNATIONAL GOVERNMENT OF CONCEPT LUXURY LLC. and others
Defendant:
THE STATE OF INDIANA, TIPPECANOE/MARION COUNTY CORRECTIONS FACILITIES and LOCAL POLICE AGENCIES/FBI BUREAU OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cirba Inc. et al v. Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2022cv00403
Plaintiff:
Cirba Inc., Cirba IP, Inc. and Cirba Inc. doing business as DENSIFY
Defendant:
Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Devo, Inc. v. Hirshfeld et al
as 1:2022cv00232
Plaintiff:
Devo, Inc.
Defendant:
Drew Hirshfeld and USPTO
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071 Appeal of Decision of U.S. Patent & Trademark Office
Boundy v. United States Patent and Trademark Office(USPTO)
as 1:2021cv01366
Plaintiff:
DAVID BOUNDY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE (USPTO)
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Alexander v. Pathak et al
as 1:2021cv06445
Plaintiff:
Juanita Alexander
Defendant:
Sudhanshu Pathak, Lorraine Airmscaid, USPTO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. et al v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 1:2021cv00899
Plaintiff:
Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP
Defendant:
USPTO, Department of Commerce, Andrew Hirshfeld and United States Patent and Trademark Office
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Baker v. Raimondo
as 21-2116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DONALD L. BAKER
Defendant / Appellee:
GINA M. RAIMONDO, Secretary of Commerce, ANDREI IANCU, Commissioner for Patents, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), ANDREW HIRSHFELD, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office and others
Defendant:
UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES OF THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE AND USPTO
TBL Licensing, LLC v Hirshfeld, et al
as 1:2021cv00681
Defendant:
United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia, Attorney General of the United States, TBL Licensing, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1071
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
