Cases 1 - 10 of 54
MADERO AIR LLC et al v. PRO CRANE RENTALS, INC. et al
as 5:2026cv06002
Plaintiff:
MADERO AIR LLC, GLOBAL AIR CHARTERS INC. and GLOBAL MX LLC
Defendant:
PRO CRANE RENTALS, INC., SMILEY LIFTING SOLUTIONS, LLC and FURUKAWA UNIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Unicity International Inc v. Ray Marketing Inc
as 2:2026cv00713
Plaintiff:
Unicity International Inc
Defendant:
Ray Marketing Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
SHAVIES v. UNIBARNS TRADING INC d/b/a UNICE
as 4:2026cv03520
Plaintiff:
CHARLEEN SHAVIES
Defendant:
UNIBARNS TRADING INC d/b/a UNICE
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pinder v. Zamft, et al.
as 1:2026cv20058
Plaintiff:
Tricia Geter Pinder
Defendant:
Michael Von Zamft, STEPHEN MITCHELL, Unice Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv03977
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv05706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Race Discrimination
Gbemisola Adams v. UNice, Inc.
as 2:2025cv04273
Plaintiff:
Gbemisola Adams
Defendant:
UNice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00754
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Joseph v. Unice, Inc.
as 1:2024cv24184
Defendant:
Unice, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Wendy Joseph
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
