Cases 11 - 20 of 39
Walz v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2017cv03123
Defendant:
Union Pacific Corporation and Union Pacific Railroad Company
Plaintiff:
Tamra Walz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Spence v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2017cv03074
Plaintiff:
Marion D. Spence, II
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Hernandez v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Javier Hernandez
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
McNeil v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 8:2016cv00443
Plaintiff:
Tasha M. McNeil
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Welch v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2016cv00431
Plaintiff:
Scott Welch
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Doucet v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2016cv01001
Plaintiff:
Charles Doucet
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, Brian Mcgavock, John Huddleston and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Ibarra v. Union Pacific Railroad et al
as 5:2016cv00039
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Carmen Ibarra
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad and Railcrew Express LLC
Receiver:
CT Corporation Systems
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Koonce v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
as 0:2015cv02710
Plaintiff:
Elona Koonce
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101
Eyon Neal Christmas v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2015cv02612
Plaintiff:
Eyon Neal Christmas
Defendant:
George R Davis, Does, Kenneth R Fair and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
