Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Reid v. Dewalt
as 5:2009cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert Reid
Defendant:
Stephen M. Dewalt and United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Stell v. United States Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jovito Stell
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Sharpe v. Patton et al
as 0:2008cv00058
Plaintiff:
Chris R. Sharpe
Defendant:
B. Patton, United States Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General of the United States and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hestand v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv10822
Petitioner:
Thomas Hestand
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons and Charles Eichenlaub
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Wolf v. Stine et al
as 6:2008cv00069
Petitioner:
Eric C. Wolf
Respondent:
D.L. Stine, Paul Copenhaver, Baker and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Anderson v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv02142
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Anderson
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons, UNICOR, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Welch v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2007cv00320
Petitioner:
Cheri Welch
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Parole Commission and Ginny Van Buren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Prowse v. United States of America et al
as 1:2007fp00395
Plaintiff:
Wendell Leonard Prowse
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Parole Commission, United States Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Frost v. Dewalt, et. al.
as 5:2007cv00030
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Frost
Defendant:
Stephen M. Dewalt, C. W. Tyndall, V. Craddock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
