Cases 1 - 10 of 227
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Carrillo v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Unknown Party, Pam Solomon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carrillo v. Simple Mobile Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Simple Mobile Wireless, Google Incorporated, United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carrillo v. Cricket Wireless et al
as 2:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Judy Carrillo
Defendant:
Cricket Wireless, Homesite Insurance, Christopher Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Markham v. United States Department of Defense
as 4:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
John W. Markham
Defendant:
United States Department of Defense
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv06468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01692
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
