Cases 31 - 40 of 75
Matthew Egler v. USA, et al
as 21-15940
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRET SERVICE, MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PAUL PENZONE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SILVANUS EGLER
PATEL v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01076
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, EMORY UNIVERSITY, UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff:
RAJ K. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Matthew Egler v. USA, et al
as 21-15541
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRET SERVICE, MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, PAUL PENZONE and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MATTHEW SILVANUS EGLER
Egler v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv02116
Defendant:
United States Possessions and Territories, U.S. Military, Jared Kushner and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Silvanus Egler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PERGROSSI v. UNITED STATES MILITARY
as 1:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER JON PERGROSSI
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MILITARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parisi v. United States of America et al
as 7:2020cv06205
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS PARISI
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES MILITARY ACADEMY, a/k/a USMA, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, United States Military Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Lopez v. United States Military Entrance Processing Command et al
as 3:2020cv00313
Plaintiff:
Minyon Lopez
Defendant:
Major Rowlett and United States Military Entrance Processing Command
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754
HEMINGWAY v. UNITED STATES FBI et al
as 2:2020cv00638
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY PAROLE OFFICE, PECO ELECTRIC, LOWER MAKEFIELD POLICE and others
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN JAMES HEMINGWAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DILLARD v. UNITED STATES MILITARY
as 1:2019cv00130
Plaintiff:
OBADIAH SAVOY DILLARD
Defendant:
UNITED STATES MILITARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
