Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Rindahl v. Malsam-Rysdon et al
as 4:2022cv04073
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Kim Malsam-Rysdon, Joan Adam, Kristi Noem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Brumley v. Sessions et al
as 5:2018cv01196
Defendant:
Steven Rosenbaum, Unknown Personnel and Jeff Sessions
Plaintiff:
Clifton Brumley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LAWSON v. BANTA et al
as 2:2018cv03670
Plaintiff:
TYREE LAWSON
Defendant:
KELLY LONG, BANTA and SCI PHOENIX'S ENTIRE MAILROOM UNKNOWN PERSONNEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rindahl, Randy v. Walker, Scott et al
as 3:2017cv00445
Plaintiff:
Randy Lee Rindahl
Defendant:
Scott Walker , Brad Schimel, Sara Larson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frankie LordMaster v. Messer
as 16-6879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE JAE LORDMASTER, f/k/a Jason Robert Goldader
Defendant - Appellee:
MESSER, Sergeant at Red Onion, JOE DOE, C-3 Unit Manager at Red Onion, EARL BARKSDALE, Warden at Red Onion and others
Sholes v. Shicker et al
as 1:2015cv01475
Plaintiff:
Robert Sholes
Defendant:
Louis Shicker, Andrew Tilden, Theresa Arroyo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CREDICO v. UNKNOWN EMPLOYEE OF THE HOUSTON FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION et al
as 2:2013cv03309
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN MICHAEL CREDICO
Defendant:
UNKNOWN EMPLOYEE OF THE HOUSTON FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, UNKNOWN PERSONNEL OF THE U.S. COUNTER PROLIFERATION DIVISION, JOHN/JANE DOE #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapin v. Durr et al
as 6:2008cv00883
Plaintiff:
Reynold Sare Chapin
Defendant:
F. Durr, Massie, United States Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chapin v. Durr et al
as 3:2008cv00883
Plaintiff:
Reynold Sare Chapin
Defendant:
F. Durr, Massie, United States Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
