Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Yates #619169 v. Rogers et al
as 2:2018cv00180
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers and Lisa Belanger
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Yates #619169
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamby #254713 v. Rogers et al
as 2:2018cv00154
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Jamie Corrigan and S. Thompson
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hamby #254713
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brinkman v. Ryan et al
as 4:2018cv00380
Defendant:
Roland Buchanan, Gloria Gethier, Unknown Lopez and others
Plaintiff:
Albert L Brinkman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowens v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 2:2018cv02073
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Paul Penzone, Unknown Alcula and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jermaine Bowens, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gann v. Penzone et al
as 2:2018cv01822
Plaintiff:
Jason Douglas Gann
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Unknown Vail, Unknown Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crossfirst Bank et al v. Vieste SPE LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01637
Plaintiff:
Crossfirst Bank , Crossfirst Investments Incorporated , Nancy Hanna and others
Defendant:
Vieste SPE LLC , Vieste Energy LLC , Vieste LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carroll v. Rogers et al
as 4:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant:
"Unknown" Rogers, Unknown Muffett, Unknown Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Rogers et al
as 3:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Michael Dean Carroll
Defendant:
Unknown Rogers, Unknown Muffett and Unknown Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Edmonds #096224 v. Bucholz et al
as 2:2017cv04645
Plaintiff:
Winston Veodust Edmonds
Defendant:
Unknown Bucholz, Unknown Thompson, Unknown Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Camboni v. McCain et al
as 2:2017cv04443
Plaintiff:
Anthony Camboni
Defendant:
John McCain, Cindy McCain, Republican National Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
