Cases 61 - 70 of 1,206
King-Banks, Melissa v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 3:2023cv00165
Plaintiff:
Melissa Sue King-Banks
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Larkin v. Larkin et al
as 2:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Aria Larkin
Defendant:
John P. Larkin, II, JP II, Inc, Barbara R. Blackman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Haughey v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2023ct03037
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Haughey
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HOOKER v. UNNAMED DEFENDANT'S
as 1:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL HOOKER
Defendant:
UNNAMED DEFENDANT'S
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richardson v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2022mi00075
Plaintiff:
Raymond Richardson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Ivey v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2022mi00068
Plaintiff:
Marvis McDaniel Ivey
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Battle v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2022ct03312
Plaintiff:
Michael Battle
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, United States of America, Strickland and Webster L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ABADI v. WALMART INC et al
as 1:2022cv00228
Plaintiff:
AARON ABADI
Defendant:
WALMART INC, WAL-MART STORES EAST LP, JANET T MILLS and others
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - NON PRISONER IFP CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lococo v. Unnamed Defendants
as 2:2022cv00108
Plaintiff:
Al Lococo
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2022mi00028
Plaintiff:
Bondaryl McCall
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s)
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
