Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Selecky v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
as 8:2017cv01217
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Selecky
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
CMH Homes, Inc. et al v. Simmons et al
as 2:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
CMH Homes, Inc. , CMH Manufacturing, Inc. , Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mary C. Simmons and Sarah Banks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv02096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Palmore-Archer v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01069
Defendant:
John Doe, Hon. Robert J. McDonald and Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Gail Palmore-Archer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Grishm v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00011
Plaintiff:
Bobby Grishm
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Jessel v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
as 3:2016cv00705
Plaintiff:
David Jessel
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 022
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv00204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hendricks v. Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc et al
as 6:2016cv02050
Plaintiff:
Tallie E Hendricks
Defendant:
Vanderbilt Mortgage and Finance Inc , Equifax Information Services LLC and Merchants Credit Bureau Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
HENCH v. CMH HOMES, INC. et al
as 4:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
WENDY HENCH
Defendant:
CMH Homes Inc. , CMH Manufacturing, Inc. , VANDERBILT MORTGAGE AND FINANCE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
