Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ferguson v. Via
as 1:2026cv02901
Plaintiff:
Blaire Ferguson
Defendant:
VADM Darren K. Via
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Via v. Maidoo et al
as 7:2026cv00689
Plaintiff:
Allan Ray Via
Defendant:
Maidoo, RN, T. Williams, RN, Warden Paul Hibbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colony Insurance Company, as successor via merger to Peleus Insurance Company v. Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc.
as 1:2026cv05203
Plaintiff:
Colony Insurance Company, as successor via merger to Peleus Insurance Company
Defendant:
Accredited Surety and Casualty Company Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Harris v. Langley et al
as 1:2026cv02670
Plaintiff:
Detrick Harris
Defendant:
Archie Langley, Emmitt L. Sparkman, Google and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01702
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Microsoft Corporation, et al.
as 26-5136
Plaintiff:
INGRID JOHNSON, minor R.R.
Defendant:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, APPLE INC., OPENAI, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv08785
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Stanley, Jr. v. TSG Commissary et al
as 3:2026cv07628
Plaintiff:
Rodric Petrece Stanley, Jr.
Defendant:
TSG Commissary, David O. Livingston, Via Path and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jacobs et al v. Gainer et al
as 1:2026cv02038
Plaintiff:
Andre Jacobs and Saysha Barnes
Defendant:
Ben Gainer, Global Tel Link Corporation d/b/a via Path Technologies and Warden Gregory Briggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
