Cases 41 - 50 of 187
James O Rourke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv04884
Plaintiff:
Joan O'Rourke, James O'Rourke, James O Rourke and others
Defendant:
Fairbanks Morse Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Debtor In Possession:
Hill Brothers Chemical Company, Inc. and IMO Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Winant et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 4:2020cv02189
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC (fka Foster Wheeler Corporation), IMO Industries Inc., Dixie Packing & Gasket Company, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Winant and Diane Winant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Widener et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2020cv02076
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC (fka Foster Wheeler Corporation), General Electric Company, CBS Corporation (fka Viacom Inc., fka Westinghouse Electric Corporation) and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Widener and Verlene Widener
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis C. Payne et al v. Abb, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv01713
Defendant:
YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to FRICK COMPANY), VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY), AMERICAN COMPRESSOR COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Payne and Dennis C Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Christopher Clarke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant:
PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest 10 KEYSTONE VALVES & CONTROLS, INC.), Gardner Denver, Inc., J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clarke and Clarke Cheryl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pizarro et al v. Astra Flooring Company et al
as 3:2019cv08427
Defendant:
York International Corp., individually and as successor in interest to Lillard Co. and Lilco, Inc., Spirax Sarco, Inc., National Steel and Shipbuilding Company and others
Plaintiff:
Renato C Pizarro, Mercedita D Pizarro and Mercedita D. Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Pizarro, et al v. Astra Flooring Company et al
as 3:2019cv08425
Defendant:
John Crane Inc., Astra Flooring Company, Darcoid Company of California and others
Plaintiff:
Renato C Pizarro and Mercedita D. Pizarro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant:
OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff:
George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Patrick W. Dennis et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09343
Plaintiff:
PATRICK W DENNIS, ROSA DENNIS and Patrick W. Dennis
Defendant:
AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Petitioner:
VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
