Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 57
Beverly v. Vitran Express, INC. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv01599
Plaintiff: Candace Beverly , Adrianna Nemes , Frances Mitchell and others
Defendant: Vitran Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEVERLY v. VITRAN EXPRESS, INC.
as 2:2012cv01499
Plaintiff: CANDACE BEVERLY
Defendant: VITRAN EXPRESS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOYLE et al v. NINO MADIA FURNITURE, INC. et al
as 2:2012cv01744
Plaintiff: ALFREDO DOYLE and GLORIANA DOYLE
Defendant: NINO MADIA FURNITURE, INC. , VITRAN EXPRESS INC. , MY FREIGHT WORLD TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00611
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brandon Campbell v. Vitran Express, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-55052
Plaintiff - Appellee: BRANDON CAMPBELL, individually and on behalf of members of the general public similarly situated, and as aggrieved employees to the Private Attorney General ACT (PAGA)
Defendant - Appellant: VITRAN EXPRESS, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6556
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vitran Express, Inc. v. Countryline, Inc.
as 7:2011cv00497
Defendant: Countryline, Inc.
Plaintiff: Vitran Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Brandon Campbell v. Vitran Express, Inc.
as 11-80236
Plaintiff - Respondent: BRANDON CAMPBELL
Defendant - Petitioner: VITRAN EXPRESS, INC.
Brandon Campbell et al v. Vitran Express, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv05029
Plaintiff: Brandon Campbell and Ralph Maldonado
Defendant: Does and Vitran Express, Inc.
Type: Labor Labor: Other
VITRAN EXPRESS, INC. v. DIAMOND LOGISTICS, INC.
as 2:2011cv02827
Plaintiff: VITRAN EXPRESS, INC.
Defendant: DIAMOND LOGISTICS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 11702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?