Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Ramos et al
as 4:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Anthony Miles, Sablan, Morley Myron and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Smith
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duane A. Finks v. Deputy Van Wyck et al
as 8:2015cv01946
Defendant:
Deputy Thompson, Deputy Van Wyck and O.C. Sheriff's Dept.
Plaintiff:
Duane A Finks
Finks v. Deputy Van Wyck et al
as 3:2015cv02105
Plaintiff:
Duane A Finks
Defendant:
Deputy Van Wyck, Deputy Thompson and O.C. Sheriff's Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Wyck et al v. General Electric Company et al
as 3:2015cv00846
Plaintiff:
Wayne John Van Wyck and Agnes Van Wyck
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Foster Wheeler LLC, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Willis v. Moore et al
as 3:2014cv01363
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Willis
Defendant:
Michael E. Moore, Jason A. Rodenbo , Robert S. Besser and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Van Wyck v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2012cv02374
Plaintiff:
Helen Van Wyck
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon Women's Health & Urology
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leach v. OASAS et al
as 1:2012cv02141
Plaintiff:
Monte S. Leach
Defendant:
Samaritan Village- Van Wyck, Harry Scott and Carlos Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Van Wyck v. Charleston Sanitary Board
as 2:2010cv01029
Plaintiff:
John Van Wyck
Defendant:
Charleston Sanitary Board
Cause Of Action: 77 U.S.C. § 7777
Court:
Fourth Circuit
›
West Virginia
›
US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Type:
Other Statutes
Randolph Wolfson v. J. Brammer, Jr., et al
as 09-15298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDOLPH WOLFSON
Defendant - Appellee:
J. WILLIAM BRAMMER, Jr., JOHN C. GEMMILL, ANGELA H. SIFUENTES and others
Wolfson v. Brammer, et al
as 3:2008cv08064
Defendant:
Colleen Concannon, John Pressley Todd, Marion Weinzweig and others
Plaintiff:
Randolph Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
