Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Newson v. Chase Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Chase Bank, Raiz Federal Credit Union, El Paso Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamonte, Jr. v. Pierce et al
as 1:2023cv00124
Plaintiff:
Charlie Lamonte McKinney, Jr. and Al-Kareem-Khalil
Defendant:
Special Agent Matthew Pierce, G.D.C. Criminal Investigation Division, G.D.C. Office of Professional Standards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ensley v. Verizon Wireless et al
as 2:2022cv04651
Plaintiff:
Mark H. Ensley
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless, PURETALK USA, AT&T and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Firas Ayoubi v. U.S. Bank N.A., et al
as 22-2216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIRAS M. AYOUBI
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, WALMART INC., UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Engel v. Verizon Wireless
as 4:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Defendant:
Verizon Wireless
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCleary v. Metro P.C.S. et al
as 1:2021cv02702
Plaintiff:
David dwayne McCleary
Defendant:
Metro P.C.S., Cricket Wireless, T-Mobile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Hirano v. Sand Island Treatment Center et al
as 1:2020cv00473
Defendant:
John Does 1-200, Verizon Wireless, Kate McClory and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Hirano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ayoubi v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv05665
Defendant:
Unk Verizon Employee, Verizon Wireless, Mojahed Ihmud and others
Plaintiff:
Firas M. Ayoubi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Pederson, et al
as 6:2020cv01403
Defendant:
Jose L. Gonzalez, Verizon Wireless, Robbin Edward Lilly and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Bernard Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
