Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Baxter v. Burton et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Destiny Baxter
Defendant:
Tonya Burton, Christopher Rakes, Anthony W. Vickery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Discrimination in Federally-Funded Education Program
Montez v. Aguirre & Gonzalez et al
as 5:2023cv00448
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rick Montez
Defendant:
Aguirre & Gonzalez, Ramos & Del Cueto, Jeffrey C. Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Christopher Richardson v. David Davis, et al
as 22-12644
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
SHERIFF OF MACON-BIBB COUNTY, DAVID DAVIS, MACON-BIBB COUNTY and others
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 4:2020cv00309
Defendant:
Clerk Patricia S. Connor, Ms. Christa T. Bell, David Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04591
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
RICHARDSON v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2020cv00320
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, Deputy Lawrence Prichard, Deputy Devin Keith and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher M Richardson, ATTORNEY DEBRA G GOMEZ and CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Razmus v. Kent, County of et al
as 1:2020cv00451
Defendant:
Jacob Vickery, Anthony Ysquierdo and Kent, County of
Plaintiff:
Matthew James Razmus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Razmus v. Kent County et al
as 2:2020cv11252
Defendant:
Deputy Anthony Ysquierdo, Deputy Jacob Vickery and Kent County
Plaintiff:
Matthew Razmus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
