Cases 21 - 30 of 104
Bohanon v. Vantrell et al
as 1:2022cv01161
Plaintiff:
Nakia Bohanon
Defendant:
Vince Vantrell and FNU Huggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank Motto, Jr. v. Vince Mullins
as 21-5702
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANK JOHN MOTTO, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
VINCE MULLINS
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. v. M Vince Nail Spa, LLC et al
as 3:2021cv00366
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vince Nail Spa, Inc. doing business as M. Vince Nail Spa
Defendant:
Binh T. Nguyen, M Vince Nail Spa, LLC, Raymond T. Do and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cleavenger et al v. City of Barberton et al
as 5:2021cv00557
Plaintiff:
Todd Cleavenger doing business as TNS Promotions doing business as Fast Lanes doing business as Ohio Specialized Inv, Thaiden Cleavenger, Ohio Specialized Investments, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Brian Davis, Michael Green, Summit County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01203
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Knowles v. Core Civic Association et al
as 2:2020cv06277
Defendant:
Vince Vantell, Milhoun, Warden LeRose and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Knowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drazdik v. Kao Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00509
Plaintiff:
Andrew Stephen Drazdik, Jr.
Defendant:
KAO U.S.A. H.Q., Kao Corporation, Keith Pings and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Henderson v. Sell et al
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Neal Pinkston, Chattanooga, TN Housing Authority, Andrew Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. C.R Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv02480
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard
Plaintiff:
Vince Bishop
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Branch v. City of Bartlett et al
as 2:2020cv02180
Defendant:
Vince Dixon, John D. Owen, Jr., City of Bartlett and others
Plaintiff:
Aaron R. Branch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
