Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Lindell, Nate v. Carr, Kevin et al
as 3:2024cv00287
Plaintiff:
Nate A. Lindell
Defendant:
Kevin A. Carr, Sarah Cooper, Douglas G. Percy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samsa, Dennis v. Rohwer, Dastin et al
as 3:2023cv00144
Plaintiff:
Dennis Samsa
Defendant:
Dastin Rohwer, Timothy Houg, Ethan Marczewski and others
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Linzie Andrew Humes v. Patricia McCoy et al
as 7:2021cv00373
Plaintiff:
Linzie Andrew Humes
Defendant:
E. Kelly, Major Johnny Billiter, Rasnake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00375
Defendant:
FISCHER, CUPP, T. DAVIS and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TAYLOR v. BROWN et al
as 2:2020cv00191
Defendant:
B. TRIMBLE, FISCHER, HARDBALL and others
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vires v. True
as 3:2019cv00929
Respondent:
B. True
Petitioner:
Earnie L. Vires
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peace v. Douma et al
as 2:2015cv00262
Plaintiff:
Daniel Anthony Peace
Defendant:
Timothy Douma , Lucas Wogernse, Warden Meisner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Agricultural Dept. et al
as 6:2014cv00168
Plaintiff:
Oceanus Perry
Defendant:
Agricultural Dept., Dept. of Justice, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Vires v. University of Louisville Hospital Stroke Team John and Jane Doe(s) et al
as 3:2012cv00488
Plaintiff:
Herman Vires
Defendant:
University of Louisville Hospital, Doctor John Doe, Pharmaceutical Company John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Baker et al
as 6:2010cv00068
Plaintiff:
Vincent Eugene Walker
Defendant:
T. Baker, D. Vires, W. Reams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
