Cases 21 - 30 of 39
REYES v. LANIGAN et al
as 2:2014cv06499
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO REYES
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, KENNETH NELSEN, WASIK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Norman et al
as 2:2014cv00082
Plaintiff:
William C. King
Defendant:
Candy Norman, Laurel Wasik, Evella Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll, et al v. Fentress County Sherriff Dept, et al
as 14-5340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM CARTER KING
Defendant - Appellee:
LAUREL WASIK
Wasik et al v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv24588
Plaintiff:
Susan Wasik and Henry Wasik
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc., Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wasik et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as CT/3:13-cv-01169
Plaintiff:
Susan Wasik and Henry Wasik
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc , Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Wasik et al v. Johnson & Johnson Inc et al
as 3:2013cv01169
Plaintiff:
Susan Wasik and Henry Wasik
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Inc, Ethicon, Inc. and Ethicon, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BRYANT v. WASIK et al
as 2:2013cv02818
Plaintiff:
PONTELL BRYANT
Defendant:
WASIK, HUDSON, GOMEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borowski-Wasik et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv02031
Plaintiff:
Deborah Borowski-Wasik and Zbigniew Wasik
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Terry v. Fentress County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ronda Terry
Defendant:
Fentress County, Tennessee, Anthony (Tony) Choate, Evella Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. Velocity Express, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00318
Plaintiff:
David Montanez
Defendant:
Velocity Express, Inc., Vincent A. Wasik, Arlene Jordan and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
