Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wayne Burgess v. City of Pulaski, TN, et al
as 26-5645
Plaintiff:
WAYNE BURGESS
Defendant:
CITY OF PULASKI, TN, CITY OF PULASKI, TN POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER JOEL ROBISON and others
Burgess v. McLaughlin
as 5:2025cv02040
Petitioner:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Respondent:
McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Jenson et al
as 5:2025cv01686
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
McLaughlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burgess v. City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
City of Pulaski/City of Pulaski Police Department, Officer Joel Robison, Officer John Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgess v. Allen
as 5:2023cv01548
Petitioner:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Respondent:
Kelly Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Allen
as 5:2022cv01388
Petitioner:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Respondent:
Kelly Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burgess v. Turner et al
as 5:2021cv00920
Plaintiff:
Charles Patrick Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
Wells Turner, Martha Williams, Jeff Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BURGESS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45055
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WAYNE BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgess v. Huckabee et al
as 3:2016cv00270
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
Allison Huckabee, Caleb Underwood and Jacob White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. Klopfenstein et al
as 4:2015cv00003
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Wayne Burgess
Defendant:
Lin Klopfenstein and Ron Mullen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
