Civil Rights Cases
BYRD v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv00873
Plaintiff: AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hutson v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv03543
Plaintiff: M.B. Hutson
Defendant: Thomas L. Harper, Esq., R. Wayne Byrd Estate, John Wilkerson, Esq. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00600
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Stephens County Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv02678
Plaintiff: Austin Wayne Byrd
Defendant: Stephens County Georgia and Stephens County GA Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Stephens County Georgia et al
as 2:2023cv00121
Plaintiff: Austin Wayne Byrd
Defendant: Stephens County Georgia and Stephens County GA Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BYRD v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff: AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant: NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shorter et al v. Byrd et al
as 6:2021cv00145
Plaintiff: Michael Daniel Shorter and Sasha Elaine Shorter
Defendant: Roger Wayne Byrd, Dorman Patrick, John and/or Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BYRD v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY JOHN/JANE DOE DECISION MAKERS 1-10 et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv08064
Plaintiff: WAYNE BYRD
Defendant: CUMBERLAND COUNTY JOHN/JANE DOE DECISION MAKERS 1-10, CUMBERLAND COUNTY OFFICE OF THE SHERIFF EMPLOYEES, AGENTS AND/OR SERVANTS 1-10, SHERIFF ROBERT A. AUSTINO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?