Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Davis v. Davies et al
as 2:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Mrs. Davies and David Pedro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doyle Davis v. James Corcoran, et al
as 22-55959
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CORCORAN, Correctional Officer, J. PULIDO, Correctional Officer, R. SKOG, Correctional Officer and others
Davis v. Shinn et al
as 4:2021cv00283
Petitioner:
Michael Wayne Davis
Respondent:
Arizona Board of Executive Clemency, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jonathan La Wayne Davis v. FCA US LLC
as 5:2021cv00801
Defendant:
FCA US LLC, DOES 1 through 20, inclusive and Moss Bros. CJD, Inc. a California Corporation doing business as Moss Bros Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram Fiat Moreno Valley
Plaintiff:
Jonathan La Wayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davis v. Texas Roadhouse Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02437
Defendant:
Texas Roadhouse Incorporated, Texas Roadhouse Holdings LLC and Texas Roadhouse Management Corporation
Plaintiff:
Chris Wayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. USA
as 4:2017cv00085
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kenneth Wayne Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Davis v. Penzone et al
as 2:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
Francis Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Joseph Arpaio, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle Davis v. Daniel Paramo, et al
as 17-55390
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Warden, R.J. Donovan Prison, M. GLYNN, Chief Executive Officer, S. ROBERTS, Chief Medical Executive and others
Davis v. Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2017cv01514
Plaintiff:
Francis Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, Hastings, Emerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Paramo et al
as 3:2016cv00689
Plaintiff:
Doyle Wayne Davis
Defendant:
Daniel Paramo, M. Glynn, S. Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
